Transtrend is one of the systematic trend following operations that has quietly produced hundreds of millions, if not billions, in profit while most of the financial media focused elsewhere. Based in Rotterdam, the firm has run its Diversified Trend Program since 1992, making it one of the longer-standing systematic CTA operations in the world. Its principals have included Gerard van Vliet, Johannes P.A. van den, Jaap Schotanus, and Harold M. de Boer. Unlike many firms built around a single named trader, Transtrend has operated as an institutional research-driven operation, letting the system and the ideas speak rather than the personalities behind them.
That model, systematic, continuously evolving, and deeply skeptical of marketing claims, reflects exactly what the best long-run trend following operations share. The same diversification logic that Richard Dennis built into the Turtle rules and that John W. Henry applied across global futures markets is central to how Transtrend approaches the problem of capturing price trends without being destroyed by any single bad position or adverse market environment.
The Diversified Trend Program: Three Decades of Live Trading
The Diversified Trend Program trades globally across futures, forwards, and swap markets on a wide variety of underlying assets. Its objective is to generate absolute returns with low correlation to traditional asset classes, participating in the underlying price trends that drive markets worldwide. The program is fully systematic and does not follow any benchmark or index. Entry and exit signals are generated algorithmically, with continuous evaluation and improvement of the systems that identify those signals.
Transtrend’s own description of what drives market trends is worth absorbing: most price trends are a reflection of broader developments in a continuously evolving world. Each development, whether an increased impact of extreme weather, shifts in agricultural production, economic growth in China, changes in political sentiment, or the emergence of new technologies, typically gets reflected in price trends across multiple markets simultaneously. The program is designed to capture that reflection, wherever it appears, long or short, without requiring a fundamental view on the underlying cause.
This is the same architecture that drives every serious systematic trend following operation. The market provides the signal. The system follows the signal. The diversification across uncorrelated markets ensures that no single trend’s failure destroys the portfolio, while the combination of trends across many markets produces the long-run positive expectancy that makes the strategy work over time.
On the Art of Trend Following and the Replicator Challenge
Transtrend has published some of the most thoughtful research on what systematic trend following actually is and why it cannot simply be replicated by applying publicly available momentum rules. Their position on this question is direct: there has never existed a simple technical trading rule that can be applied year after year consistently generating profits. The belief that historical CTA returns can be reproduced by backtesting a set of time series momentum strategies assumes a non-changing world with non-changing markets, which is precisely the opposite of reality.
This connects to the core debate that surrounded the Turtle experiment. Dennis believed trading could be taught. Eckhardt was more skeptical. Transtrend’s view, drawn from their own three decades of live trading, is nuanced: the Turtle experiment demonstrated that a trading methodology could be transmitted from one practitioner to another, but that successful trend following requires continuous adaptation. Eckhardt himself said in 2011 that he was still doing the same thing he always had been, but that there was not one part of his systems that had not been modified. Transtrend has operated on exactly that basis since 1992.
The replicator challenge also reveals something important about where the real intellectual work in systematic trading lives. It is not in the entry and exit rules themselves. As Transtrend has argued, the choice of investment universe may be a more decisive factor for individual program returns than the choice of trading systems. A trend following program can only profit from a trend in a market that it actually trades. That sounds obvious but carries profound implications for how portfolio construction decisions are evaluated relative to signal development decisions. Van Tharp made a related point about position sizing: the variables most investors focus on are often not the ones that explain most of the performance variation.
Benchmarks, Diversification, and the Index Question
Transtrend has engaged seriously with the question of whether investors should simply allocate to a CTA index rather than to individual managers. Their answer is characteristically careful. CTA indices like the SG Trend Index are composed of different managers employing different approaches. The longest-standing constituents have likely not employed the exact same strategy over the years, just as successful companies evolve their products while maintaining their brand. Diversification across individual CTA managers with genuinely different approaches produces lower volatility than any single program, just as diversification across stocks produces lower volatility than any single holding.
Their core position on this question aligns with what the best systematic managers have always argued about managed futures: the value comes not just from the returns but from the low correlation to traditional asset classes. A managed futures allocation that adds genuine diversification to a stock and bond portfolio is worth having even if its absolute return in any given year is modest, because the combination produces better risk-adjusted outcomes than either asset class alone.
The Quiet Institutional Model
Transtrend belongs to the category of firms that Michael Covel described as mysterious operations not built around individual names, quietly pulling billions in profits out of the markets. Alongside Sunrise Capital, Aspect Capital, Man Investments, and similar institutions, Transtrend has demonstrated that the trend following edge is institutional as much as it is individual. The names associated with the firm matter less than the systematic framework they have built, refined, and operated consistently over decades.
That institutional quality is exactly what the best Turtle graduates also built. Jerry Parker‘s Chesapeake Capital, Paul Rabar‘s Rabar Market Research, and Tom Shanks‘s Hawksbill Capital all evolved from individual trading operations into durable institutions with research processes and risk architectures that could outlast any single person’s judgment or attention. Transtrend arrived at the same destination from a different starting point, but the institutional model, systematic, research-driven, and continuously adapting, is recognizably the same.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Transtrend?
Transtrend is a Rotterdam-based systematic trend following CTA that has operated its Diversified Trend Program since 1992. The firm trades globally across futures, forwards, and swap markets and manages assets for institutional investors worldwide. Its principals have included Gerard van Vliet, Johannes P.A. van den, Jaap Schotanus, and Harold M. de Boer.
What is the Diversified Trend Program?
The Diversified Trend Program is Transtrend’s flagship systematic strategy, trading globally across a wide variety of commodity and financial futures markets. It aims to generate absolute returns with low correlation to traditional asset classes by participating in underlying price trends. The program has been trading live since 1992 and is continuously evaluated and improved by Transtrend’s research team.
Why does Transtrend argue that trend following cannot be simply replicated?
Transtrend’s research argues that the belief CTA returns can be reproduced by applying publicly available momentum rules assumes a static world with static markets, which is false. Successful trend following requires continuous adaptation and research. The evidence supporting replicator strategies consists primarily of simulations using hindsight and current technology rather than live trading experience across multiple market regimes.
How does Transtrend relate to the Turtle trading tradition?
Transtrend shares the core principles of the Turtle approach: systematic entry and exit signals, diversification across uncorrelated markets, and continuous adaptation of the underlying systems. The firm has operated on the Eckhardt principle that the methodology remains constant while the specific systems evolve, which is the same approach that has sustained the most durable Turtle-trained operations over three decades.
Trend Following Systems
Want to learn more and start trading trend following systems? Start here.
