Fundamental analysis, buy and hold, value investing, CNBC, stock pickers, day trading–stop. Enough. Those typical investing approaches, popularized by media for decades, are not the way to build true wealth. Explore trend following and learn something different.

The title question contains its own answer. Ignorance is not an excuse for trading failure — but it is also not a permanent barrier to trading success. The two statements are not contradictory. Ignorance of the correct approach explains poor trading outcomes. But ignorance can be corrected. The Turtle experiment is the documented proof that trading knowledge is transferable. Richard Dennis took 23 people who had no trading experience, taught them a systematic approach in two weeks, and produced traders who generated over $100 million in profits. The ignorance was eliminated by education, and the education produced results.

The excuse that makes ignorance permanent is the refusal to seek out and apply correct knowledge. That is the ignorance the title is addressing. Someone who has been told that CNBC recommendations, buy-and-hold strategies, and stock tips are not viable paths to building wealth, who has been pointed toward systematic trend following as a documented alternative, and who still chooses the familiar approaches over the unfamiliar correct ones, cannot claim ignorance as an excuse. The information is available. The choice to act on it or ignore it is the trader’s own.

The specific approaches the opening lists, fundamental analysis, buy and hold, value investing, day trading, represent a wide range of effort and sophistication. A fundamental analyst who studies annual reports and builds financial models is working hard. A buy-and-hold index investor is doing almost nothing. A day trader is extremely active. All of them are operating within frameworks that have documented limitations: fundamental analysis does not provide exit criteria, buy-and-hold has no loss management, and day trading compounds transaction costs faster than it generates returns. These limitations are not obscure. They are extensively documented. Continuing to operate within these frameworks while the documentation of their limitations is available is a choice, not ignorance.

The alternative, systematic trend following, requires learning a different framework. It requires accepting that price is the primary input, that losses are a structural feature of any positive-expectation approach, that win rate is less important than payoff ratio, and that position sizing is more important than entry signals. None of these concepts are difficult to understand. All of them require a genuine willingness to challenge the conventional wisdom that financial media and the brokerage industry have promoted for decades. That willingness is the starting point. The ignorance, once acknowledged, can be corrected. The choice to acknowledge it is the only prerequisite.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is ignorance not an excuse for trading failure?

Because the information required to trade correctly is available and well-documented. Decades of performance data from systematic trend following managers is publicly available. The rules and principles that produced those results have been published and explained. The behavioral and psychological errors that cause most traders to fail have been documented in academic research. A trader who continues to lose money using approaches whose limitations are documented cannot claim ignorance of the correct alternative.

What did the Turtle experiment prove about trading knowledge?

That it is transferable. Richard Dennis took 23 people with no trading experience, taught them a systematic approach in two weeks, and produced traders who generated over $100 million in profits. The experiment is direct evidence that trading success does not require innate talent, specific background, or years of independent experience. It requires the right rules, the discipline to follow them, and the willingness to accept the approach’s loss characteristics.

What is the difference between ignorance as a barrier and ignorance as an excuse?

Ignorance as a barrier is temporary and correctable. A trader who does not yet know the correct approach can learn it. Ignorance as an excuse is the claim that the correct approach cannot be found or learned, used to justify continuing with familiar but ineffective methods. The first is a starting point. The second is a choice to remain at the starting point despite the availability of information that would allow moving forward.

Trend Following Systems
Want to learn more and start trading trend following systems? Start here.