Here is an excerpt from an interview with Paul Tudor Jones:

Q: What sparked your original interest in trading?

A: I went to New York and saw the floor of the commodities exchange and there was such an energy level there and so much excitement that I knew that was the place for me. I’ve always liked action and the exchange seemed like a perfect home for me.

Q: When did you decide you wanted to run a fund?

A: In 1976 I started working on the floor as a clerk and then I became a broker for E.F. Hutton. In 1980 I went strictly on my own as what they called a local and did that for about two and a half years and had two and a half wonderfully profitable years, but I really got bored. I applied to Harvard Business School, got accepted and was about to go. I literally was packed up to go and then I thought, ‘this is crazy’, because for what I’m doing here, they’re not going to teach me anything. This skill set is not something that they teach in business school. So I didn’t go, I stayed, but I was really bored because there wasn’t the personal interaction that was something that I craved and having colleagues and being in a clean atmosphere and that was when I started my fund. All through growing up I’ve been involved in team sports and fraternities and in school I was involved in a whole variety of activities all of which were team oriented and when I was on my own I was printing money every month, but I wasn’t getting the psychic satisfaction from it.

Q: How would you describe your general investment philosophy?

A: I think I am the single most conservative investor on earth in the sense that I absolutely hate losing money. My grandfather told me at a very early age that you are only worth what you can write a check for tomorrow, so the concept of having my net worth tied up in a stock a la Bill Gates, though God almighty it would be a great problem to have, it would be something that’s just anathema to me and that’s one reason that I’ve always liked the futures market so much, because you can generally get liquid and be in cash in literally the space of a few minutes. So that always appealed to me because I could always be liquid very quickly if I wanted to. I’d say that my investment philosophy is that I don’t take a lot of risk, I look for opportunities with tremendously skewed reward-risk opportunities. Don’t ever let them get into your pocket — that means there’s no reason to leverage substantially. There’s no reason to take substantial amounts of financial risk ever, because you should always be able to find something where you can skew the reward risk relationship so greatly in your favor that you can take a variety of small investments with great reward risk opportunities that should give you minimum draw down pain and maximum upside opportunities.

What Jones’s Philosophy Shares with Systematic Trend Following

Jones’s self-description as “the single most conservative investor on earth” is surprising to anyone who knows his macro trading reputation. The clarification that conservation means hating to lose money, not avoiding volatility, is the key distinction. A conservative investor in Jones’s framing is one who never allows a loss to become so large that it threatens the portfolio’s ability to recover and continue operating. This is identical to the systematic trend following principle: cut losses early, let winners run, never sustain a loss that exceeds the defined stop.

The Harvard Business School decision is the clearest statement available from a top practitioner that trading skill is not taught in conventional educational settings. Jones had two and a half years of consistently profitable trading behind him. Harvard had nothing to teach him about what was producing those results. The skill, whatever it was, was developed on the floor and through direct market experience, not in a classroom. He understood this at the moment of decision, packed and ready to leave, and turned around.

The grandfather’s “only worth what you can write a check for tomorrow” formulation is the liquidity principle stated in generational wisdom terms. Jones’s preference for futures over concentrated equity positions is the institutional implementation of the same principle: futures can be liquidated in minutes, equity positions in illiquid stocks cannot. The trader who holds concentrated illiquid positions cannot write a check for the full value of their portfolio tomorrow because the act of liquidating would move the price against them. Jones’s preference for futures is partly about the speed of systematic signal execution and partly about the fundamental conservatism of always being able to access full liquidity.

The “skewed reward-risk opportunities” formulation is the positive expected value description that all systematic trading approaches target. A trade where the potential gain is five times the potential loss, entered at a defined entry point with a defined stop loss, has a positive expected value even if it loses more often than it wins. Jones’s philosophy of taking many small bets with highly skewed reward-risk ratios is the same as the systematic trend following approach: each individual position risks a small percentage of equity, and the positions that become winners run to many multiples of the initial risk.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does Paul Tudor Jones describe himself as the most conservative investor on earth?

Because he defines conservation as absolute refusal to let losses grow beyond defined limits rather than as avoidance of volatility or risk. His grandfather’s principle that you are only worth what you can write a check for tomorrow means that preserving access to liquid capital is the first priority. A concentrated illiquid equity position, regardless of its current value, fails this test. Futures positions that can be liquidated in minutes pass it. The conservatism is about protecting the portfolio’s capacity to act, not about avoiding price volatility.

What does Jones mean by skewed reward-risk opportunities?

Trades where the potential gain substantially exceeds the potential loss. A position where the entry and stop define a maximum loss of 1% of equity and the potential trend could produce a gain of 5-10% of equity has a highly skewed reward-risk ratio. Jones’s strategy of taking many such positions simultaneously means that the portfolio’s expected return is positive even with a low win rate, because the winning positions produce multiples of what the losing positions cost. This is the mathematical structure of systematic trend following.

Why did Paul Tudor Jones choose futures markets over equity markets for his trading?

Primarily for liquidity. Futures positions can generally be liquidated in minutes, allowing the trader to access full cash value of their portfolio rapidly when needed. Concentrated equity positions, especially in large sizes, cannot be liquidated quickly without moving the price adversely. The liquidity preference reflects Jones’s core conservatism: always maintain the ability to write a check for your net worth tomorrow. Futures markets make this possible in a way that concentrated equity positions do not.

Trend Following Systems
Want to learn more and start trading trend following systems? Start here.