Larry Hite, who was profiled in Jack Schwager’s Market Wizards series, spoke recently to a group of students. An excerpt:
I believe I had to get into this business because it was simple. There are just a few questions you got to ask yourself. It’s like a checklist that you have to go through. I’m going to go through those questions, discuss them with you, and they can save you a lot of grief. I don’t know that they will make you a lot of money, but mostly they do. I mean, making money in the markets is more simple than it’s not. The trouble is that sometimes you get in the way, or if you’re working for a firm, they get in the way, because there are a lot of social implications. First I’m going to tell you a little about math. I have a guy that works for me, [who] graduated from Wharton, magna cum laude, and we were sitting around one day and we were, I don’t remember what we were doing but we had to figure out the compounded rates of return, and instead of using a calculator we were just looking at the numbers and doing it in our heads. He was young and just out of college, and he kind of felt puffed up about it. You know, it made us feel smart, which is a rare feeling for me. Then I said to him, “You know Michael, the problem with this is anybody can do this with six dollar calculator. You don’t have to be a phi beta kappa. Anybody can do this.”
Later he continued:
One of the great things about the market is, the markets don’t care about you. The market doesn’t care what color you are. The markets don’t care if you are short or tall. They don’t care about anything. They don’t care whether you leave or stay…I met the guy who wrote this best seller now called, Bringing Down the House, it’s about these MIT guys who beat the blackjack tables. And part of the problem, if you’re going to be a blackjack counter is that the casinos don’t like you. They actively don’t like you. And they come and tell you in rather strong things to take your business away. Well, the beautiful thing about the markets, they don’t like you, they don’t dislike you, they just don’t care. They are there everyday. You want to play, you can play. You don’t want to play, don’t play. And you can choose. You sit, there is no penalty. You know, when you stand you know…I don’t know how many of you play baseball…when your at bat if something comes through the strike[zone], if you don’t swing you still get a strike against you. But the markets are a no penalty game. You can stand there and wait. You can go home and wait. It doesn’t matter. And that’s really a terrific thing.
Many people lose sight of the main goal of trading the markets. Instead of worrying about making money, they worry about how much they are trading. Keep Hite’s words close, and don’t forget the main goal.
Why Simplicity and Patience Are the Edge
Hite’s point about the Wharton graduate is the same point the entire TurtleTrader project makes in different language. The math required to trade systematically is not advanced. It does not require a Wharton education, a Phi Beta Kappa key, or a PhD in quantitative finance. It requires a six-dollar calculator and the discipline to apply simple rules consistently. The difficulty is not intellectual. It is behavioral. The trader who gets in the way of their own system, who overrides signals, who adds positions the rules do not justify, who exits early because they are uncomfortable, is the obstacle. Not the math.
The no-penalty game observation is the complete argument for patience in systematic trading. A baseball batter faces a penalty for not swinging at a strike. A market trader faces no such penalty. You can stand at the plate indefinitely. You can wait for the exact pitch your system defines as a valid entry. You can pass on fifty mediocre setups and wait for the one your rules specify. The market will still be there. No strike is called. No penalty accumulates. This is the structural advantage that traders who over-trade systematically throw away. They manufacture urgency in a game that requires patience. They take swings at pitches they should let pass because they feel the pressure to be active.
Hite’s casino comparison completes the picture. Blackjack counters face institutional resistance. The casino will eject them. The market will not. There is no authority monitoring your approach and banning you for having a systematic edge. The market is indifferent. It presents opportunity equally to everyone who participates. The trader with the right rules and the discipline to follow them can participate indefinitely without anyone trying to stop them. That indifference, which Hite describes as the market not caring whether you stay or go, is the freedom that makes systematic trading available to anyone willing to build and follow a sound approach. For the checklist Hite alludes to, see the TurtleTrader rules.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is Larry Hite and why is his perspective valuable?
Larry Hite is the co-founder of Mint Investment Management Company, one of the largest commodity trading advisors of the 1980s and 1990s. He was profiled in Jack Schwager’s Market Wizards, which documented his systematic approach and the returns it produced. His perspective combines academic grounding with decades of practical experience running a large systematic trading operation.
What does “the markets are a no penalty game” mean for traders?
It means there is no cost to waiting. Unlike baseball, where not swinging at a pitch in the strike zone counts against you, a trader who passes on a suboptimal setup pays no penalty. The market presents the next opportunity the following day. This structural reality is the argument for patience and selectivity: wait for the exact entry your system defines, accept no substitutes, and pass on everything else without penalty.
Why does Hite say “you get in the way” as the main obstacle to trading success?
Because the math of systematic trading is simple enough for anyone to execute. The obstacle is not intellectual capacity. It is the behavioral tendency to override the system, add positions the rules do not justify, exit early to protect profits, or hold losers too long to avoid admitting a mistake. The trader’s own psychological responses to market conditions are the primary source of underperformance relative to what the rules would produce if followed without interference.
Why does Hite compare trading favorably to blackjack counting?
Because blackjack counting, despite producing a genuine edge, faces institutional resistance. Casinos identify counters and eject them. Markets have no such mechanism. A trader with a systematic edge can apply it indefinitely without institutional interference. The market is indifferent to the method used, the trader’s background, or the size of the edge being applied. That indifference is a structural advantage that no other edge-generating activity in finance fully replicates.
Trend Following Systems
Want to learn more and start trading trend following systems? Start here.
