R. Jerry Parker, Jr.
Chesapeake Capital Corporation

Jerry Parker, the most successful of the turtles, recently spoke to a crowd of non-believers at the annual Futures and Options Expo in Chicago. The term non-believers is used since many in the modest sized audience seemed intent on stumping the laid back Parker with inane questions and general disbelief in trend following.

Parker spoke at length about the dangers of a buy and hold mentality stating the strategy of buy and hold is bad. “Hold for what?”, he said.

He then offered that a key to successful traders is their ability to leverage investments. “Many [traders] are too conservative in their willingness to leverage.” Parker painted a picture where risk for many is simply a term defined by belief rather than his view of risk which is measured in concrete terms.

Systems

The quant jocks should take note of Parker’s self-deprecating tone in describing the success of his firm. He explained that he is more comfortable trading through a system than he would be if he was picking individual moves:

I would hate it if the success of Chesapeake was based on my being some great genius. It’s the system that wins. Fundamental economics are nice but useless in trading. True fundamentals are always unknown. Our system allows for no intellectual capability.

In response to questions concerning his opinion on where individual markets may be headed:

I don’t know nor do I care. The system that we use at Chesapeake is about the market knowing where it’s going.

Most of the skeptics in the audience simply seemed to not understand these statements or were plain ignorant. His bottom line summation:

Trend following with rules works.

Side Bar from Financial Trader Magazine

How does a trader who earns $35 million spend his money? How about making America better! For Jerry Parker, the unpretentious super trader from Lynchburg, Va., the most important work occurs around the kitchen table. That’s where Parker’s wife, a certified teacher, home schools the family’s three children. “I was a small town person and Rich Dennis rescued me from leading a normal life,” says Parker. A Turtle who trained under Dennis and founded Chesapeake Capital Management in 1988. “Since technical trend following follows its models [Parker states], we’re not really interested in people who are experts at the French stock markets or German bond markets. It doesn’t take a huge monster infrastructure — not Harvard MBAs and people from Goldman Sachs.”

More info here. Learn about Curtis Faith here.

What Parker’s Expo Presentation Demonstrates

The audience’s resistance at the Futures and Options Expo is a microcosm of the broader market’s skepticism toward systematic trend following. The skeptics had a genuine intellectual investment in their own approaches, whether fundamental analysis, discretionary trading, or buy-and-hold equity investing. Parker’s statements challenged not just their trading methodology but the entire framework of beliefs about what trading skill means.

“Our system allows for no intellectual capability” is the statement that produces the most resistance among sophisticated audiences. It sounds dismissive of the effort they have invested in developing expertise. The correct reading is different: the system removes the need for intellectual judgment at the point of trade execution. The intelligence is in the system’s design. The execution requires only the discipline to follow the rules when they fire, regardless of what the trader’s intellect says about whether the specific trade is a good idea at that moment.

“I don’t know nor do I care where individual markets are headed” is the statement that generates the most disbelief from fundamental analysts who have invested years developing expertise in specific sectors. The question “where is crude oil headed?” feels like a question that someone with Parker’s trading experience should be able to answer. His answer that the system is about the market knowing where it’s going is the practitioner’s statement of price-reactive rather than predictive trading. The market’s price action knows where it’s going before any analyst’s model does. The system follows the price. The analyst follows the model.

Parker’s background, a small-town person from Lynchburg Virginia who was rescued from a normal life by Richard Dennis, is the human version of the Dennis thesis. You do not need Goldman Sachs credentials or Harvard MBAs or expertise in French equities or German bonds. You need the rules, the discipline to follow them, and the capital to trade them. Parker has managed billions at Chesapeake Capital for decades. The credentials he lacks have never been relevant to the results.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does Jerry Parker say “hold for what?” about buy and hold?

Because buy and hold has no defined exit strategy. It is a directional commitment with no explicit criteria for when to exit the position. The holding period is indefinite and the exit is typically driven by external events, retirement needs, or emotional capitulation during market downturns, not by a systematic rule. Parker’s question cuts to the absence of an exit framework: if you are holding, you must have defined conditions under which you will stop holding. If you have not defined those conditions, you are not managing the position. You are hoping.

What does “our system allows for no intellectual capability” mean?

That the trading decisions at the point of execution require no intellectual judgment beyond following the rules. The system fires when conditions are met. The trader executes the order. No analysis of the current market environment, no assessment of whether this specific trade looks promising, and no override of the signal based on current views is permitted or required. The intellectual capability went into building the system. The execution requires discipline, not intelligence.

Why did Parker say the audience at the Expo was largely ignorant?

Because their questions and skepticism reflected a fundamental misunderstanding of what systematic trend following does and why it works. The audience was applying the framework of fundamental analysis and discretionary trading to evaluate an approach that operates on entirely different principles. Questions about which markets Parker thinks will rise or fall were irrelevant to his approach because the system does not operate on market views. The ignorance was not about market knowledge but about the conceptual framework of price-reactive systematic trading.

Trend Following Systems
Want to learn more and start trading trend following systems? Start here.