Wharton offers insight on ‘How Human Behavior Drives Investment Activity’.
The Wharton paper documents a lecture by Lewis A. Sanders, then CEO of Alliance Capital Management, delivered as part of Wharton’s Musser-Shoemaker Lecture series. Sanders argued that capital markets themselves are derivatives of the biases and preferences people bring to decision-making, and that behavioral finance insights hold across all asset classes and national boundaries. His formulation: “People are people wherever you find them.”
The lecture identified three asset pricing drivers rooted in human behavior. The first is what Sanders called “the overwhelming affection for things that are, or appear to be, certain.” Investors systematically overvalue certainty and undervalue probability. This preference for certainty over expected value produces the same pricing errors that the five questions framework for systematic trading addresses: investors exit winners early to lock in certain gains and hold losers to avoid confirming certain losses. Both behaviors are driven by the affection for certainty that Sanders identifies.
The second driver is the anchoring tendency: investors fixate on reference prices, typically their purchase price, and evaluate gains and losses relative to that anchor rather than relative to current market conditions. A stock that has fallen 40% from purchase is evaluated as a 40% loss relative to the anchor, not as a current market opportunity evaluated on its own merits. This anchoring produces the holding of losers past their rational exit point and the premature sale of winners when they return to the purchase price.
The third driver is herding: investors follow the crowd, particularly in the direction of recent price momentum, because social validation provides psychological safety. When a market has been rising for an extended period, the crowd is confident and the consensus is bullish. When it falls sharply, the crowd is fearful and the consensus turns bearish. Both transitions happen after the price movement that should have informed them, not before. The herd follows the price move rather than anticipating it.
All three drivers Sanders identifies are structural sources of the price trends that systematic trend following captures. Certainty-seeking produces the premature exits and late entries that create momentum. Anchoring produces the delayed responses to fundamental changes that extend trends beyond their fundamental justification. Herding amplifies both effects as each new participant drawn into the consensus reinforces the trend. A systematic approach that buys breakouts and lets winners run is capturing the behavioral dynamics that Sanders documents in academic terms.
Sanders’s point that these insights hold across fixed-income, debt, equity, and currency markets regardless of national boundaries is the universal applicability claim that systematic trend following embodies. The same rules that capture equity trends capture bond trends and currency trends because “people are people wherever you find them.” The behavioral biases that produce trends in US equity markets produce the same trends in European currency markets and Asian commodity markets. The instruments differ. The human psychology driving the price behavior is identical.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the Wharton paper argue about human behavior and markets?
That capital markets are driven by human behavioral biases rather than rational information processing. Lewis Sanders identified three specific drivers: the preference for certainty over probability, anchoring to reference prices, and herding behavior. Each produces systematic pricing errors that persist because the biases are structural features of human cognition rather than correctable mistakes. These biases create the persistent price trends that systematic trend following is designed to capture.
How does the certainty preference produce trading opportunities?
By causing investors to exit winning positions too early (to lock in certain gains) and hold losing positions too long (to avoid confirming certain losses). Both behaviors are the opposite of what systematic trend following requires. The premature exit of winners by certainty-seeking investors provides exit liquidity for trend followers who hold winners to the defined trailing stop. The delayed exit of losers by certainty-seeking investors provides the momentum of orderly trend development before capitulation selling accelerates the move.
Why do Sanders’s findings validate systematic trend following specifically?
Because the three behavioral drivers he identifies are exactly the mechanisms that produce the price trends systematic approaches capture. Certainty preference and anchoring produce delayed responses to changing conditions that extend trends. Herding amplifies the trends as more participants follow the consensus. A reactive systematic approach that enters when price breaks above defined levels and exits when price reverses is positioned to capture the full extent of the trends these behavioral dynamics produce, including the final acceleration when herding reaches its peak.
Trend Following Systems
Want to learn more and start trading trend following systems? Start here.
