Michael Mauboussin’s process vs. outcome research identifies the single most important distinction for anyone operating in a probabilistic field like investing or trading. The core argument is that the most successful investors and traders share three characteristics: they focus on process rather than outcomes, they think probabilistically, and they keep score properly.
The process versus outcome distinction matters because in any probabilistic activity, a good process can produce a bad outcome and a bad process can produce a good outcome on any individual trial. A coin that lands heads 60% of the time will still land tails 40% of the time. The bet that was correct given the odds can still lose on a specific flip. Judging a decision by its outcome rather than by the quality of the process that produced it leads to systematic errors in self-assessment, system evaluation, and learning from experience.
In trading, this produces two specific failure modes. The first is abandoning a sound system after a losing streak. The system that wins 40% of the time with a 3:1 payoff ratio is a profitable system. It will also produce losing streaks of six or seven trades with calculable regularity. A trader who evaluates the system by recent outcomes rather than by the quality of the process will abandon it during the losing streak, which is precisely when staying with a sound system is most important. The second failure mode is continuing a flawed approach after a lucky run. A trader who made money for six months using a strategy with negative expected value will attribute those gains to skill rather than luck, and will continue the strategy until the negative expected value expresses itself in losses that cannot be explained away.
Probabilistic thinking, Mauboussin’s second characteristic, is the ability to evaluate decisions in terms of the distribution of outcomes they are likely to produce rather than in terms of the single outcome they actually produced. A systematic trend follower who entered a position according to the rules and lost money on that trade made a correct decision. The outcome was unfavorable. The process was sound. Evaluating the decision by the outcome rather than by the process produces the same error in both directions: correct decisions that produce bad outcomes are condemned, and incorrect decisions that produce good outcomes are praised.
Proper scorekeeping, the third characteristic, means measuring performance against the correct baseline. A trend following system should not be evaluated by whether it made money in the last three months. It should be evaluated by whether its returns across multiple years and multiple market environments are consistent with the system’s expected probability distribution. This requires keeping track of not just the wins and losses but the quality of the process that produced them: were the position sizes correct, were the exits taken at the defined levels, were the entries taken when the signals fired rather than when the trader felt confident.
The three characteristics together describe the complete psychological framework for evaluating and following a systematic trend following approach. Process over outcome. Probabilistic thinking. Proper scorekeeping. These are not trading techniques. They are the mental operating system that makes systematic trading executable over the long run.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the process vs. outcome distinction and why does it matter?
It is the recognition that in probabilistic activities, a correct process can produce an incorrect outcome and an incorrect process can produce a correct outcome on any individual trial. What determines long-run performance is the quality of the process, not the outcome of any individual decision. A trader who evaluates their process by outcomes rather than by the quality of the decision-making will make systematic errors in what they continue and what they abandon.
What does probabilistic thinking mean for systematic traders?
It means evaluating each trading decision by the distribution of outcomes the process is expected to produce rather than by the specific outcome it actually produced. A system that wins 40% of the time with a 3:1 payoff ratio will lose on 60% of individual trades. Each of those losses, if the entry and exit rules were followed correctly, represents a sound decision with an unfavorable outcome. Probabilistic thinking recognizes this distinction. Outcome-based thinking treats each loss as evidence of a wrong decision.
How does proper scorekeeping differ from normal performance tracking?
Proper scorekeeping evaluates whether the process was followed correctly and whether the observed results are consistent with the system’s expected probability distribution across a sufficient sample. Normal performance tracking evaluates only whether money was made or lost in the recent period. The former can distinguish between a sound system in a difficult period and a flawed system that requires adjustment. The latter cannot, because a three-month losing period is consistent with both a sound system having normal variance and a flawed system failing.
Trend Following Systems
Want to learn more and start trading trend following systems? Start here.
