First time visitor? Click here. | Login | Register

Divergence Trading? Is this part of great systems trading?

Michael Covel (March 28, 2005)

A question arrived recently:

A fellow traders has told me "the trend is your friend and you should trade in the direction of the trend, unless there is a major divergence. If there is a major divergence, the divergece is your BETTER friend and probability favours trades (in the next lower timeframe, ala Elder's triple screen) in the direction of the major divergence". Do you agree with this statement? Is this something you have studied? An example of a major indicator divergence is defined as a MACD line and histogram divergence, when the macd hist rises/falls below 0 (see chart below).

click to see full size

This is a great question as it offers us a chance to argue the bigger picture. There is an assortment of indicators one could use for entry and or exit. For example, some of the best traders use price breakouts. But fixating on a magical indicator solution misses the point unfortunately. What should you do instead? Answer these 5 questions:

  1. How does the system determine what market to buy or sell at any time?
  2. How does the system determine how much of a market to buy or sell at any time?
  3. How does the system determine when you buy or sell a market?
  4. How does the system determine when you get out of a losing position?
  5. How does the system determine when you get out of a winning position?

Answer these 5 questions first. If your divergence indicator idea is part of answering the 5 questions -- go for it -- after sufficient testing.

amazon.com

Complete TurtleTrader
Order now!

The Complete Turtle story. Legend, lessons & results.

amazon.com

Trend Following
Order now!

Now available: the new expanded edition. Order online today.

Get started

If you would like to find articles by category simply choose from the list below.

  • Market Wizards Jim Simons

    The advantage scientists bring into the game is less their mathematical or computational skills than their ability to think scientifically. They are less likely to accept an apparent winning strategy that might be a mere statistical fluke. (Read more)

Meet Michael Covel

Blog | Read bio